THE VOICE CONTROLLED. By Irini Papadimitriou, Future Everything.

Author: Irini Papadimitriou

Every atom, impressed with good and with ill, retains at once the motions which philosophers and sages have imparted to it, mixed and combined in ten thousand ways with all that is worthless and base. The air itself is one vast library, on whose pages are for ever written all that man has ever said or woman whispered. There, in their mutable but unerring characters, mixed with the earliest, as well as with the latest sighs of mortality, stand for ever recorded, vows unredeemed, promises unfulfilled, perpetuating in the united movements of each particle, the testimony of man’s changeful will. 

 Charles Babbage: Ninth Bridgewater Treatise (1838), Chap. IX. On The Permanent Impression Of Our Words And Actions On The Globe We Inhabit 

The Voice Controlled

Over 180 years ago, Charles BabbageVictorian polymath and inventor of the first mechanical computer, proposed that the air is a vast library’ of every word ever spoken. If he could be here today he would immediately notice that his proposal had actually become a reality. Contemporary technologies are fulfilling our obsession for absolute recollection and Babbagethinking resonates today more than ever. Every word, image, action or movement of ours is forever impressed and recorded in an age of cloud computing and connectivity – at a time of digital archives of everything – and in a society of full-scale surveillance.  

Starting from this vast library’ and through a combination of phantasmagoric effects and emerging technologies, Rafael Lozano-Hemmer creates an ever-changing audio-visual environment to transport us into a three-dimensional, physical manifestation of Babbages proposal. In Atmospheric Memory the invisible air” of recorded voices, memories or data, materialises in front of our eyes. Invisible clouds of spoken or whispered voices” are unveiled in front of us and transformed into something we can touch and see. In a theatrical and engaging way, Lozano-Hemmer urges us though to look at these voices” beyond than mere archives or libraries of words that would be otherwise lost. In a way, Atmospheric Memory presents us with how we have transformed the air” surrounding us into a giant machine that always listens and records our actions. What are the implications of this obsession with monitoring everything that happens or being said? And can we ever reverse this? 

The visionary English mathematician and writer Ada Lovelace, known mainly for her work on BabbageAnalytical Engine had imagined the Analytical Engine to be able to do a lot more than used as a calculating machine. For instance, she thought the Analytical Engine could be used to produce algorithmic music – something that later became possible for computers, as she predicted. Lovelace envisioned Babbages machine to be able to manipulate content such as text, sound or images. Could Lovelace had imagined the Analytical Engine able to capture or acquire a voice?  

Sixty years earlier, inventor Wolfgang von Kempelen, known for his chess playing pseudo-automaton – The Turk – made what was probably one of the earliest attempts to build a speaking machine. Kempelen explored the physiology of speech production and created a mechanism to appropriate the human voice. The speaking machine could produce sounds, words and even sentences, although hardly comprehensible. In the early 1860s, a young Alexander Graham Bell created a speaking head” after seeing an automaton by Charles Wheatstone, inspired by Kempelens speaking machine. It will be years later and more research and experiments that will lead to Bell’s invention of the telephone, which opened up a new field of voice communication technology, but also a long journey of wiretapping and intercepting voices.  

We have since learned to give up our rights to electronic privacy and surrender to a web of listening devices or smart speakers that have taken a place in our lives and occupied our domestic spaces. A whole world of connected objects, from home assistants, TVs and household appliances to wearables, cars, and urban objects and furniture constantly observe and listen to us, but we are getting accustomed to ignore this. 

But long before the existence of these now ubiquitous connected devices, prevailed a series of monitoring, eavesdropping systems and architectures of control, from acoustical wall funnels and optical apparatuses to Jeremy Benthams panopticon prison structure composed of a central watching tower surrounded by cells. In the 17th century, celebrated scholar and polymath Athanasius Kircher designed statua citofonica or ‘talking statue, an early intercom system with a series of spiral-shaped funnels hidden in the walls of a building that connected courtyards and public spaces creating a giant listening device. Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler reference Kircherstatua citofonica in their recent brilliant mapping study of The Amazon Echo – in the context of human labour, data and material resources – talking about the Echo as a listening agent and ear” in the home.1  

An Amazon Alexa cut in half

Alexa cut in half, as displayed within Atmospheric Memory Chamber

Alexa, the voice assistant who speaks to us through the Amazon Echo, along with other voice enabled devices and smart speakers that have taken a place in our homes, are not anymore perceived as commercial products; they are actual voices. By anthropomorphising Alexa, Siri or similar, by giving them a human-like voice, we forget what these systems really are. They become advisors, confidants, educators, they are there for us to converse with and trust them. Yes, every word we speak is probably recorded in the airthat invisible mesh of listening systems formed by our Alexas, Siris, Google Homes, thermostats and so on. One day your appliances will know your whereabouts, conversations, journeys, purchases, browsing histories. We tend to look at these devices as individual entities, although they are disembodied parts of a large, complex networked, corporate system. Kirchers talking statues that reproduce the eavesdropped conversations from the street, picked from the spiral-shaped tubes, hidden in buildings, perfectly depict our surveillance society today.  

Danish artist Cecilie Waagner-Falkenstrøm recently created FRANK, an artwork using Artificial Intelligence. FRANK is a humanised voice that can have conversations with people; it is a speaking oracle, a synthetic voice based on machine intelligence that gives personal guidance regarding existential dilemmas. You can talk to FRANK about personal anxieties, hopes, dreams and fears. FRANK will listen and give you his” insightful direction and counselling. Actually, speaking to FRANK is not so different from how we talk to Siri, Alexa or how we might be interacting in the next few years with more voice interfaces 

Voice is an organ that identifies us and that is uniquely ours. From birth, voice – our first cry – marks our existence to the world, but its also one of the main modes of human expression, emotion and communication. More than 200 years after Kempelens speaking machine, computer systems that not only recognise, but can also synthesise human speech are commonplace, and our voice can serve as training data sets for teaching machines to speak imitating human speech. Applications such as Baidu, Deep Voice or Lyrebird use machine learning to create human-like artificial voices or enable the cloning of human speech. Imitating any human voice has become a reality that raises serious concerns and questions about how technologies like this could be used but also misused.  

Our words are not only forever imprinted and captured in this vast library’ of the Cloud, our (disembodied) voice is also taken over, borrowed by a machine. In The Invention of Morela novel by Argentine writer Adolfo Bioy Casares, the main character in the novel, a fugitive, is hiding on a desert island until one day he sees a group of tourists arriving, so he retreats away from them2. Among the tourists is a woman whom he spies on and falls in love with her. The fugitive tries to talk to the woman but she ignores him and slowly he realises none of the tourists notice him either. He also notices there are two moons and two suns, conversations are repeated, and the island visitors complain they are cold when its hot or swim in a pool or rotting fish. He finally finds out the truth, that one of the island visitors, named Morel, invented a machine capable of reproducing reality. The group of tourists that he sees then are a recording of Morels machine looping their actions in a week on the island forever. By recording them though, the machine has captured their souls, so they are all dead.  

Voice is a metaphor for agency and power. In a society obsessed with capturing its actions, images and voices, we quickly see the romantic and positivist side of retaining memories, failing to see the context of metrics and surveillance. Who has control over what is kept and what is left behind? And who owns these vast libraries of our voices, actions, or data? In a contemporary society of absolute recollection, people with the weaker voices and the most vulnerable members of the community have even less control over becoming subjected to invisibility or hypervisiblity. So the possibility to go back, be forgotten or escape will be probably available to only the privileged few in the future. 

Future Sessions

As part of Rafael Lozano-Hemmers Atmospheric Memory project, FutureEverything is curating The Air of Turbulence, a day of debates, conversations and participatory sessions exploring ideas of digital heritage, future histories and voices in the context of the Cloud, ownership, power and control. Taking Rafael Lozano-Hemmers Atmospheric Memory and its inspiration from Charles Babbage as a starting point, The Air of Turbulence brings together artists, researchers, technologists, scientists and other participants to debate and unravel emerging technological advances and challenges looking through the past, present and future. Symposium speakers include William Tunstall-Pedoe, founder of Evi (now Amazon Alexa), Sam Burton, Director of Insights at Mozilla Foundation, artists Rafael Lozano-Hemmer, Katriona Beales, Anna Ridler and Joana Moll, researchers Sarah Mander, David Jackson, Vladan Joler and many more.  

Find out more about Future Sessions.